Tuesday, April 1, 2008

More “Not A” Legal Opinions From The City


Drawing: Majestic Star Casino and garage

Ooooooh …….. So close, yet …

On Friday, the City and Don Barden filed a legal brief stating that the proposed Majestic Star Casino’s garage is not a “structure”, but rather it is a “use”.

Dang! And here Ms. Pist thought they’d take her suggestion and claim the garage was not a garage, but instead a “bridge of cutting-edge design” which diverts traffic from one end of the casino property to the other.

In other casino news ..... State legislators want to change PA slots laws so as to remove our "welcome mat" for organized crime.

In other on-going, scandal-related administration news ….. We’ve had political potholes, political plowing, and now we have political parking.

1 comment:

Bram Reichbaum said...

My take on the casino article: the City AND Majestic Star filed a legal brief -- majestic star answered all the questions -- no voice from the City.

And we KNOW the Mayor and the County Exec are on the Riverlife Task Force. So um ... what's going on?